EMERGENCY MOTION by Unknown Gokul R. to vacate minute order (Dkt.[37]), declare settlement agreement expired and unenforceable, prohibit third-party account debit, and order of the immediate release of restrained Walmart funds. (Received via pro se online portal on 10/14/2026)
和解/判决执行进展Olivier Le Queinec v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
案件进展
37 条记录MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: On October 5, 2026, this Court issued an order and directed Plaintiff to show cause why service of process was sufficient and satisfied the standards for service under the Seventh Circuit's decision in Kangol. (Dckt. No. [36]) This Court directed Plaintiff to respond by October 12, 2026, and forewarned that a failure to comply would lead to dismissal. That deadline passed a few days ago, and Plaintiff has not responded. Plaintiff has not shown that it effectuated proper service of process in a timely manner. So the case is over. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The motion for a default judgment (Dckt. No. [22]) is denied as moot. The motions for additional time to respond to the complaint (Dckt. Nos. [25], [28]) are denied as moot. The case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
案件结案MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant Jai Sree Ram's motion for an order authorizing direct debit of settlement funds from a restrain Walmart account (Dckt. No. [34]) is hereby granted, with a caveat. Defendant Jai Sree Ram operates a storefront in India, and has reached a settlement with Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec. Due to banking restrictions, Jai Sree Ram cannot wire funds directly to the United States. So Jai Sree Ram seeks an order authorizing Walmart to transfer the settlement amount of $1,000 from the account balance of Jai Sree Ram, and remit those funds to Plaintiff's counsel (JiangIP LLC). According to Defendant, "[a] court-ordered direct debit split evenly between the two accounts provides the safest, fastest, and most legally secure method to ensure the Plaintiff receives their funds while successfully resolving this matter." Walmart isn't a bank, and this Court does not know if Walmart would object to making such a transfer. Then again, this Court understands that Defendant's Walmart account has the proceeds from the sale of counterfeit goods, so there is a nexus to the case at hand. Maybe Walmart has no objection. This Court authorizes Walmart to transfer $1,000 from the account balance of Jai Sree Ram, and remit those payment to Plaintiff's counsel (JiangIP LLC). The parties can sort out with Walmart if there is any objection, and anyone can seek appropriate relief as need be. Mailed notice.
和解/判决执行进展MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: tiff served process on defendants through email under Rule 4(f)(3), as this Court authorized. (Dckt. No. [15]) Since then, the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import & Export Co., 177 F.4th 793, 797 (7th Cir. 2026). There, the Seventh Circuit held that the Hague Convention prohibits email service in China. But the Seventh Circuit pointed out that the Convention does not apply when the address is unknown, despite diligent efforts to find the address. Article 1 of the Hague Convention states that it "shall apply in cases. where there is occasion to transmit a judicial or extrajudicial document for service abroad," but "shall not apply where the address of the person to be served with the document is not known." Hague Service Convention, Nov. 15, 1965, 20 U.S.T. 361, 362. "District courts handling Schedule A cases typically require plaintiffs to make 'reasonably diligent efforts to ascertain and verify [the] defendant's mailing address' before deeming the defendant's address unknown." See Kangol, 177 F.4th at 799. No later than one week after the entry of this order, Plaintiff must file a statement and address service of process. Plaintiff must address what efforts, if any, it made to ascertain the addresses of the defendants. A failure to comply will lead to dismissal. Mailed notice
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to defendant no. 79 Mogyn
MOTION by Unknown Gokul R. for a court order authorizing direct debit of settlement funds from restrained Walmart account. (Received via pro se online portal on 06/22/2026)
和解/判决执行进展DEFENDANT 044'S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT PAYMENT COMPLETION AND FINAL STATUS UPDATE filed by Gokul R. (Received via pro se online portal on 6/17/2026)
和解/判决执行进展PRO SE Appearance by Unknown Gokul R. (Received via pro se online portal on 6/17/2026)
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [certain] defendants
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant FuwillTech by Steven G Kalberg
MOTION by Defendant Kunkun E-commerce for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1] (unopposed)
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Kunkun E-commerce
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Kunkun E-commerce by Ni Xue
MOTION by Defendants Carosoffe, Edwiinsa, Futuregrace, Homechoid, Hostline, Jolunifun, Kewadony, PIEPLE, PRINT PICTURE ARTHOME, Picpeak, Pinroote, QueenKer, Rocking Giraffe, Sabolny, Shine-Home, Smile Sunflower, SunShine Day, T&H Home, TocaHome, Topweek, ZOE GARDEN, ZOE STORE for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint[1] Unopposed
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Carosoffe, Edwiinsa, Futuregrace, Homechoid, Hostline, Jolunifun, Kewadony, Picpeak, PIEPLE, Pinroote, PRINT PICTURE ARTHOME, QueenKer, Rocking Giraffe, Sabolny, Shine-Home, Smile Sunflower, SunShine Day, T&H Home, TocaHome, Topweek, ZOE GARDEN, ZOE STORE by Timothy Tiewei Wang
MEMORANDUM by Olivier Le Queinec in support of motion for default judgment 22
原告申请缺席判决MOTION by Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A
原告申请缺席判决STATUS Report pursuant to Minute Entry Order 14 by Olivier Le Queinec
PRO SE Appearance by Unknown Gokul R. (Received via pro se online portal on 04/26/2026)
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Olivier Le Queinec as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 4/13/2026, answer due 5/4/2026.
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
ORDER FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 4/8/2026. Mailed notice.
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process under Rule 4(f)(3) (Dckt. No. [12]) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery (Dckt. No. [12]) is hereby granted. Order to follow. Plaintiff must file a status report or a motion for default by April 30, 2026. Mailed notice
MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte motion
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Yi Bu
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Monica Rita Martin
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Christopher Romero
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Adam Grodman
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Yanling Jiang
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Olivier Le Queinec by Keith A. Vogt
CIVIL Cover Sheet
Schedule A to Complaint 1 by Olivier Le Queinec
COMPLAINT filed by Olivier Le Queinec; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24654705.
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
