Winnie Rosaline Kan v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

案件号:2026-cv-03022起诉日期:2026/03/18原告:Winnie Rosaline Kan

案件进展

24 条记录
#24

MEMORANDUM in support of 23 Exparte motion

#22

MOTION by Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan for leave to file under seal

#21

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan regarding Response, 20

#20

RESPONSE by Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan to order on motion for leave to file, order on motion for leave to file excess pages, order on motion for exparte, terminate deadlines and hearings, set deadlines/hearings, 18

#19

Second Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Winnie Rosaline Kan

#18

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 12 is granted. However, plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages 13 and motion for TRO 14 are denied without prejudice in light of the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Liu v. Monthly, 170 F.4th 1090 (7th Cir. 2026). In Liu, the Court vacated the district court's entry of default judgment because the "evidence upon which the district court relied for establishing personal jurisdiction showed only that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois, not that such sales took place." Id. at 1093. Specifically, the evidence in Liu consisted "of screenshots of [defendant seller's] website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total, but not a completed purchase." Id. Relying on NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2022) and Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020), the Seventh Circuit explained that such evidence was insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. Here, plaintiff has submitted the same type of evidence, i.e., screenshots of defendants' website showing the checkout page, but not a completed purchase. (Dckt. #16-2). Accordingly, before this case may proceed, plaintiff must file either an amended complaint or a supplemental submission establishing a basis for personal jurisdiction as to each defendant. If an amended complaint or supplemental statement consistent with this order and Seventh Circuit precedent is not filed by 5/13/26, this action may be dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Enduring Love Int'l Church v. Williams, No. 23-CV-1120-PP, 2024 WL 3553979, at *2 (E.D.Wis. July 26, 2024) ("Although sua sponte dismissal of claims for lack of personal jurisdiction is generally disfavored, district courts retain discretion to depart from that principle"). Tracking status hearing set for 6/22/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice

原告撤诉/结案
#17

MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.

#16

SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Winnie Rosaline Kan regarding memorandum in support of motion, 15

#15

MEMORANDUM in support of 14 Exparte motion

#13

MOTION by Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan for leave to file excess pages

#12

MOTION by Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan for leave to file under seal

#11

Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Winnie Rosaline Kan

#10

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Adam Grodman

#9

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre

#8

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Christopher Romero

#7

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Monica Rita Martin

#6

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Yi Bu

#5

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Yanling Jiang

#4

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Winnie Rosaline Kan by Keith A. Vogt

#3

CIVIL Cover Sheet

#2

Schedule A to Complaint 1 by Winnie Rosaline Kan

#1

COMPLAINT filed by Winnie Rosaline Kan; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24863534.

·

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.

·

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).

添加微信免费咨询 客服微信二维码
微信号:TUE0925
电话:18790790726 / 18237197550