新立案商标历史数据

Camelbak Products, LLC

Camelbak Products, LLC

最后更新2026/08/01 19:11

案件基本信息

1:26-cv-07004
案件号
2026-cv-07004
起诉日期
2026/06/15
原告
维权品牌
CamelBak 户外装备
原告律所
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
法院
伊利诺伊州北区地方法院
法官

案件进展 Docket

29 条记录
33
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

31
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

30
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

29
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

27
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

22
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

21
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

19
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

18
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

17
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

16
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

14
密封记录自动同步

Docket entry

Docket entry

13
密封记录自动同步

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials (emc, ) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials (emc, ) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

12
密封记录自动同步

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (emc, ) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (emc, ) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

11
密封记录自动同步

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 7 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. The Seventh Circuit has clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Finally, the Seventh Circuit has also ruled that the Hague Convention does not permit service by email to defendants in China. Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 2026 WL 1502198, at *5 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). If Plaintiff intends to move to effectuate service via email on defendants located in China, then Plaintiff's motion will need to provide individualized arguments for each such Defendant that the Hague Convention does not apply, supported by details of the good faith effort Plaintiff has taken to ascertain the address of each such defendant. Mailed notice. (ym) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 7 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. The Seventh Circuit has clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Finally, the Seventh Circuit has also ruled that the Hague Convention does not permit service by email to defendants in China. Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 2026 WL 1502198, at *5 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). If Plaintiff intends to move to effectuate service via email on defendants located in China, then Plaintiff's motion will need to provide individualized arguments for each such Defendant that the Hague Convention does not apply, supported by details of the good faith effort Plaintiff has taken to ascertain the address of each such defendant. Mailed notice. (ym) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

·

MOTION by Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal

MOTION by Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal

·

Complaint

Complaint

10
密封记录自动同步

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Camelbak Products, LLC (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Camelbak Products, LLC (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

9
密封记录自动同步

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC Sealed Schedule A (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC Sealed Schedule A (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

8
密封记录自动同步

MOTION by Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

MOTION by Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

7
密封记录自动同步

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller (Miller, Elizabeth) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller (Miller, Elizabeth) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

6
密封记录自动同步

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by John Wilson (Wilson, John) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by John Wilson (Wilson, John) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

5
密封记录自动同步

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray (Mcmurray, Robert) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray (Mcmurray, Robert) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

4
密封记录自动同步

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac (Kalbac, William) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac (Kalbac, William) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

3
密封记录自动同步

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by Michael A. Hierl (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camelbak Products, LLC by Michael A. Hierl (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

2
密封记录自动同步

CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

1
密封记录自动同步

COMPLAINT filed by Camelbak Products, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25249499. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

COMPLAINT filed by Camelbak Products, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25249499. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Hierl, Michael) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

0
密封记录自动同步

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axm, )

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (axm, )

0
密封记录自动同步

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axm, )

CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (axm, )