Shuangxi Zhang V. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. On October 1, 2026, the Court permitted Plaintiff to file the unredacted Amended Complaint and Exhibits 1-7 under seal. To date, Plaintiff has not filed those documents. Plaintiff shall file the unredacted Amended Complaint and Exhibits 1-7 under seal by October 23, 2026. Failure to comply may result in dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 10 Motion to Seal. The unredacted Amended Complaint and Exhibits 1-7 may be filed under seal and shall remain under seal until further order from this Court. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom

Plaintiff's AMENDED COMPLAINT under Court's Order [ECF. No. 6] against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, filed by SHUANGXI ZHANG.

Set/Reset Deadlines, per DE #6 PAPERLESS ORDER: Amended Complaint due by 9/30/2026.

PAPERLESS ORDER striking 1 Complaint.On September 16, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Complaint with redactions without moving for leave from the Court. See Local Rule 5.4(a) ("Unless otherwise provided by law, Court rule, or Court order, proceedings in the United States District Court are public and Court filings are matters of public record. Where not so provided, a party seeking to file matters under seal... shall follow the procedures prescribed by this Local Rule[.]"). Accordingly, the Complaint was not filed in compliance with Local Rule 5.4 and is hereby STRICKEN. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint in compliance with the Local Rules and the Court's Omnibus Order Regarding Schedule "A" Causes of Action ("Order") on or before September 30, 2026. See [ECF No. 5] at 5.Further, Plaintiff is cautioned that as stated in the Order, motions to file documents under seal or to proceed anonymously or pseudonymously in intellectual property rights cases are disfavored by the Court, [ECF No. 5] at 4-5. See Landmark Commc'ns, Inc. v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829, 839 (1978) ("The operations of the courts and the judicial conduct of judges are matters of utmost public concern."); Chicago Trib. Co. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 263 F.3d 1304, 1311 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The common-law right of access to judicial proceedings, an essential component of our system of justice, is instrumental in securing the integrity of the process."); Doe v. Frank, 951 F.2d 320, 323 (11th Cir. 1992) ("It is the exceptional case in which a plaintiff may proceed under a fictitious name."). Accordingly, such motions shall be denied absent a showing of exceptional circumstances. Brown v. Advantage Eng'g, Inc., 960 F.2d 1013, 1016 (11th Cir. 1992). Signed by Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II on 9/16/2026. (ggo) (Entered: 09/16/2026)

FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint w/ Exhibits) (caw) (Entered: 09/16/2026)

COMPLAINT (redacted) against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19994476, filed by SHUANGXI ZHANG. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summon(s) (proposed) Summons, # 3 Exhibit 1 Schedule A (redacted), # 4 Exhibit 2 Patent-in-Suit (redacted), # 5 Exhibit 3 Infringing Products webpages (redacted), # 6 Exhibit 4 Amazon order records (redacted), # 7 Exhibit 5 Defendants' registered address with Amazon (redacted), # 8 Exhibit 6 Exemplary Infringement Claim Chart (redacted), # 9 Exhibit 7 Infringing Products photos (redacted))(Xue, Ni) (Entered: 09/16/2026)