MAILED original two thousand dollar surety bond posted by Pool Punisher LLC to Flener IP and Business Law 77 W. Washington St. Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60602 via certified # 9589 0710 5270 0579 7786 04. (emc, )
Pool Punisher LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
案件进展
60 条记录DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 8/13/2024. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 08/13/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The only remaining Defendant, Nika beauty, has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 54 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's design patent, copyrights, and trademark irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Because this infringement was willful and considering the value of Plaintiff's brand as well as the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $10,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages against Nika beauty. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 08/13/2024)
案件结案CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC regarding terminate hearings,,, 56 (Judge, James) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 54 against Defendant Nika beauty, which is the only remaining Defendant on Amended Schedule A 28 because Defendant HOT MAMA was voluntarily dismissed 47 . Defendant Nika beauty failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default against Defendant Nika beauty is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment by Defendant Nika beauty must be filed on or before 8/9/24. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon Defendant Nika beauty within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. No appearance is necessary on 7/31/24. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 07/26/2024)
原告撤诉/结案NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for default judgment 54 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/31/2024 at 10:00 AM. (Judge, James) (Entered: 07/25/2024)
法院作出缺席判决MOTION by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC for default judgment as to as to Defendant Nika beauty (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Motion)(Judge, James) (Entered: 07/25/2024)
法院作出缺席判决MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Preliminary injunctive relief has been entered against the remaining defendants who have not appeared in this case 52 . Summons were executed on 6/6/24 and Defendants' responses to the complaint were due by 6/27/24 49 . By 8/8/24, Plaintiff is ordered to file any motions for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). If there are any remaining defendants against whom default and default judgment are not being sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file by the same date a status report identifying each defendant against whom this case is proceeding and state whether the parties anticipate a settlement or further litigation. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
法院作出缺席判决PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/18/2024. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
法院批准初步禁令MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Telephonic motion hearing held. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 34, which the Court now considers unopposed because no Defendant filed a notice of objection by the 6/24/24 deadline or appeared at the hearing. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk that Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court on the record and in connection with entry of the TRO 29, 30, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 36, 38, 44, 46 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter Preliminary Injunction order. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously sealed documents. Telephonic motion hearing held. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 34, which the Court now considers unopposed because no Defendant filed a notice of objection by the 6/24/24 deadline or appeared at the hearing. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk that Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court on the record and in connection with entry of the TRO 29, 30, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 36, 38, 44, 46 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter Preliminary Injunction order. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously sealed documents. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
法院批准初步禁令MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the Notice of Dismissal as to Certain Defendants 47, this action is being dismissed with prejudice as to HOT MAMA only. Accordingly, HOT MAMA's motion to dismiss the temporary restraining order 41 is terminated as moot and Defendant HOT MAMA is terminated. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pool Punisher LLC as to HOT MAMA on 6/6/2024, answer due 6/27/2024; Nika beauty on 6/6/2024, answer due 6/27/2024. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Service)(Judge, James) (Entered: 07/18/2024)
STATUS Report by Pool Punisher LLC (Judge, James) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pool Punisher LLC As to Certain Defendants (Judge, James) (Entered: 07/17/2024)
CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC regarding order on motion for preliminary injunction,,,,,,,, order on motion to dismiss,,,,,,,, telephone conference,,,,,,,, set deadlines/hearings,,,,,,, 45 (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/25/2024)
法院批准初步禁令MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Telephonic motion hearing held. Plaintiff appeared through Counsel, and Weiyi Qiu appeared for herself and Defendant HOT MAMA. Ms. Qiu stated that she is the sole-owner of HOT MAMA and that she is not a lawyer. The Court advised Ms. Qiu that only a lawyer can represent a company and allowed her to speak today in court to understand her position. As discussed on the record, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 34 and HOT MAMA's related filings 39, 41 are entered and continued for telephonic hearing on 7/18/24 at 9:30AM. Attorneys/parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: 877-336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting court proceedings. For the reasons stated in the Court's initial order entering the TRO and the order extending the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this minute order upon all affected Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and promptly file proof of that service. Because no appearance has been filed for HOT MAMA, Plaintiff agrees to serve HOT MAMA via email at 123925373@qq.com and laluu.hu@gmail.com. Mailed notice. (jg, ) (Entered: 06/25/2024)
法院批准初步禁令 查看公开文件 ↗CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC regarding text entry,,,,,,,, 40 (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
CERTIFICATE of Service by Defendant HOT MAMA regarding memorandum in support of motion 42, motion to dismiss 41 . (Received via pro se email on 06/24/2024) (rc, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
MEMORANDUM by HOT MAMA in support of motion to dismiss 41 . (Received via pro se email on 06/24/2024) (rc, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
MOTION by Defendant HOT MAMA to dismiss the temporary restraining order. (Exhibits) (Received via pro se email on 06/24/2024) (rc, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: On June 21, 2024, Defendant "HOT MAMA" submitted a filing entitled "Supporting Declaration of HOT MAMA" with a "Proposed Order to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order" 39 . The Court treats this filing as an objection to Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC d/b/a Float Factory's pending Motion for Preliminary Injunction 34, which has an objection deadline of today, June 24, 2024, and is set for a telephonic hearing tomorrow, June 25, 2024, at 10:00AM (Central Time) 37 . According to Defendant HOT MAMA's objection, they received notifications concerning this matter through Amazon and not through any direct emails. In the objection and a subsequent email message sent to the courtroom deputy, Defendant HOT MAMA voluntarily provided the following email addresses: 123925373@qq.com and laluu.hu@gmail.com. In addition, the Court notes that: (1) Plaintiff's Certificate of Service for the Motion for Preliminary Injunction 36 references an exhibit to the certificate that purportedly lists email addresses to which notice was provided but fails to attach any such exhibit; and (2) Plaintiff's Certificate of Service for the Court's June 11, 2024 Minute Order 38 references Exhibit A to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction [34-1] that purportedly lists email addresses to which notice was provided but that filing does not contain any email addresses. Accordingly, to ensure that Defendant HOT MAMA has received actual notice of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction 34 and the June 11, 2024 Minute Order Setting a Telephonic Hearing for June 25, 2024, at 10:00AM (Central Time) 37, Plaintiff is directed to immediately email Defendant HOT MAMA copies of the relevant filings 34, 36, 37, 38 and this order to 123925373@qq.com and laluu.hu@gmail.com and file a certificate of service on the docket today, June 24, 2024, by no later than 5:00PM (Central Time). Mailed notice. (jg, ) (Entered: 06/24/2024)
原告提交TRO申请SUPPORTING DECLARATION of Hot Mama. (Received via box.com on 06/21/24) (aee, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/24/2024: # 1 Received Proposed Order) (aee, ). (Entered: 06/24/2024)
CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC regarding order on motion for preliminary injunction,,,,,, set deadlines/hearings,,,,,, terminate deadlines and hearings,,,,, 37 (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
法院批准初步禁令MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 34 is taken under advisement. A telephonic motion hearing is set for 6/25/24, at 10:00AM. Attorneys/parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll-Free Number: 877-336-1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting court proceedings. The motion may be considered unopposed as to any Defendant who does not file an objection by 6/24/24, and/or appear at the telephonic hearing. For the reasons stated in the Court's initial order entering the TRO and the order extending the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this minute order upon all affected Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and promptly file proof of that service. No appearance is necessary on 6/13/24. Mailed notice. (jg, ) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
原告提交PI申请 查看公开文件 ↗CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC for preliminary injunction as to Certain Defendants 34 (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
法院批准初步禁令NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 34 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 6/13/2024 at 10:00 AM. (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/10/2024)
法院批准初步禁令MOTION by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC for preliminary injunction as to Certain Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Memo In Support of Motion, # 3 Declaration of James Judge)(Judge, James) (Entered: 06/10/2024)
法院批准初步禁令MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order 32 was not accompanied by the required notice of presentment even though the Court previously reminded counsel to comply with all procedures 20, and then with the next infraction, struck the non-compliant motion 26 . This motion 32 is likewise stricken. Counsel is admonished that continued disregard of court procedures may result in sanctions. Mailed notice. (jg, ) (Entered: 06/06/2024)
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC for temporary restraining order for Extension of Temporary Restraining Order (Judge, James) (Entered: 06/05/2024)
法院批准TROSURETY BOND in the amount of $ 2,000 posted by Pool Punisher LLC. (Document not imaged) (nsf, ) (Entered: 06/04/2024)
SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 5/29/2024.Mailed notice(mjc, ) (Entered: 05/29/2024)
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and alternative service 12 is granted as to the Defendants listed on Amended Schedule A 28 . Plaintiff's written submissions establish that if Defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. The Court finds that (1) the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois); (2) the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable and cannot be fully compensated by money damages; (3) an injunction is in the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods and infringement interferes with Plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property; and (4) there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with these online marketplace defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant were to appear and object, the Court will revisit the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. A $2,000 bond is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice (mjc, ) (Entered: 05/29/2024)
法院批准TROSEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC Amended Schedule A with Supplemental Exhibits (Judge, James) (Entered: 05/28/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff Pool Punisher LLC DBA Float Factory filed this patent, copyright, and trademark infringement action against 300 defendants regarding an inflatable swimming pool accessory 7 [7-2]. After the Court questioned whether joinder of all 300 defendants in this single case was appropriate 16, Plaintiff filed a memorandum 17 and exhibit 19 asserting that these defendants appear to be "selling the same counterfeit goods from the same source and utilizing the same strategies, all within the same geographic region." (Dkt. 17 at 5). Similarly, Plaintiff argues the standard set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 299 governing patent infringement cases is satisfied by allegations of relatedness, on information and belief, at the pleading stage. The Court disagrees. At most, Plaintiff points to copycat advertising and marketing, the use of pseudonyms to conceal their identities, and other suspicions that these defendants are using the same manufacturer, but these facts, standing alone, are not enough to demonstrate a logical relationship between all 300 defendants. See Tang v. Schedule A Partnerships, No. 23 C 4587, 2024 WL 68332, at 2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 4, 2024). Even Plaintiff's detailed chart 19 purports to show that some defendants may be related to each other and that all defendants are possibly using the same manufacturer who produces a diverse range of inflatable tanks that these defendants also sell. All this confirms, though, is that Plaintiff is essentially suing every potential infringer without demonstrating the requisite connection, an action forbidden under section 299. Plaintiff further raises the possibility of permissive joinder but does not address the critical question of whether allowing this case to proceed against 300 defendants "will comport with the principles of fundamental fairness." Estee Lauder v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 186 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citing Chavez v. Ill. State Police, 251 F.3d 612, 632 (7th Cir. 2001)). Plaintiff's right to protect its intellectual property from foreign counterfeit operations is an important factor. But the Court must also consider the due process rights of the 300 defendants against whom ex parte relief, including the extraordinary remedy of freezing all their assets without notice and potentially ruining a legitimate business, is sought, as well as the interest in promoting judicial economy and managing a case against hundreds of defendants with hundreds of pages of evidentiary submissions to ensure that injunctive relief is warranted. The Court declines to exercise its discretion to allow permissive joinder under these circumstances. By 5/29/24, Plaintiff may file an amended Schedule A under seal with a significantly smaller subset of defendants consistent with this ruling, along with a supplement identifying relevant screenshot information for those defendants in the prior filings or it may reattach the relevant pages to any filing for ease of court review. Otherwise, the Court may exercise its discretion to sever and dismiss parties without prejudice to cure the misjoinder here. See UWM Student Ass'n v. Lovell, 888 F.3d 854, 864 (7th Cir. 2018). Mailed notice. (kp, ) (Entered: 05/17/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint 25 is not accompanied by the required notice of presentment. Because the Court previously reminded Plaintiff of this requirement 20 and Plaintiff has again failed to comply, the motion 25 is stricken. That said, the time limit for service in Rule 4(m) "does not apply to service in a foreign country under Rule 4(f)." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Thus, in this case where Plaintiff is seeking leave to serve foreign defendants by alternative means pursuant to Rule 4(f)(3) 12, the motion is likely unnecessary. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 04/18/2024)
MOTION by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF for extension of time to Serve Complaint (Judge, James) (Entered: 04/17/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Motion to Withdraw 22 is granted. Attorney Patrycia Piaskowski is terminated as counsel for Pool Punisher LLC. No appearance is necessary on 4/3/24. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 03/28/2024)
NOTICE of Motion by Patrycia Piaskowski for presentment of motion to withdraw as attorney 22 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 4/3/2024 at 10:00 AM. (Piaskowski, Patrycia) (Entered: 03/27/2024)
MOTION by Attorney Patrycia Piaskowski to withdraw as attorney for PP LLC DBA FF. No party information provided (Piaskowski, Patrycia) (Entered: 03/27/2024)
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF by Ying Chen (Chen, Ying) (Entered: 02/15/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal 18 is granted. The document filed at 19 shall remain under seal until further order. For future reference, counsel is reminded that all motions must be noticed for presentment in accordance with Judge Hunt's case management procedures. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 02/14/2024)
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF Exhibit 1 to Second Declaration (Judge, James) (Entered: 02/13/2024)
MOTION by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF to seal document memorandum, 17 (Judge, James) (Entered: 02/13/2024)
MEMORANDUM order on motion for leave to file excess pages,,,,,,, order on sealed motion,,,,,,, terminate motions,,,,,, 16 by PP LLC DBA FF in Support of Joinder (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Patrick W. Frank, # 2 Declaration of Zareefa B. Flener)(Judge, James) (Entered: 02/13/2024)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff names 300 defendants in this single case and seeks ex parte TRO relief against each of them 12 . However, after reviewing the complaint 7, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosmetics, Ltd. v. P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A," 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps. Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A," 21-cv-06197, 2021 WL 5493226 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021); Bose Corp. v. P'ships and Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A," 334 F.R.D. 511 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 2/20/24, Plaintiff is ordered to file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides citations to specific screenshots associated with each Amended Schedule A defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper. Alternatively, by the same deadline, Plaintiff may file under seal an amended Schedule A with a subset of the defendants and an amended declaration that explains how each of these defendants is properly joined with each other. Any amended declaration must attach labeled exhibits that contain screenshots or other information specific only to the defendants listed on amended Schedule A. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages 11 is granted. The motion for a TRO 12 is taken under advisement until the joinder issue is resolved. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 02/05/2024)
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 5 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff has filed an ex parte TRO motion, and the identity of the defendant entities will be placed under seal during the pendency of the ex parte proceedings. Given these protections for Plaintiff's legitimate interests, the countervailing strong public interest in knowing who is seeking recourse in the federal courts compels the Court to deny Plaintiff's request to conceal its own identity, even initially. As the Seventh Circuit has explained, "We have repeatedly voiced our disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate exceptional circumstances that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 376-77 (7th Cir. 2016). The Court does not find any such exceptional circumstances here that would justify allowing Plaintiff to conceal its own identity. Thus, Schedule A 9 and Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Patrick W. Frank [12-5] through [12-18] shall remain sealed until further court order. The Clerk's Office is directed, forthwith, to (1) update the docket to reflect that the Plaintiff's name is "Pool Punisher LLC DBA Float Factory"; and (2) unseal the Complaint 7, TRO motion 12, brief in support of the TRO motion [12-1], Declaration of James Judge [12-2], Declaration of Patrick W. Frank [12-3], and Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Patrick W. Frank [12-4]. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 02/02/2024)
原告提交TRO申请MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file documents under seal 5, for leave to exceed page limit 11, and for temporary restraining order 12 are taken under advisement. No appearance is necessary on 1/30/24. Emailed notice. (cdh, ) (Entered: 01/29/2024)
法院批准TRONOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages 11, motion for leave to file 5, Sealed motion,, 12 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 1/30/2024 at 10:00 AM. (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/25/2024)
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Alternative Service (Attachments: # 1 Brief in Support of Motion, # 2 Declation of James Judge, # 3 Plantiff Declaration, # 4 Ex.1, # 5 Ex.2 Pt.1, # 6 Ex.2 Pt.2, # 7 Ex.2 Pt.3, # 8 Ex.2 Pt.4, # 9 Ex.2 Pt.5, # 10 Ex.2 Pt.6, # 11 Ex.2 Pt.7, # 12 Ex.2 Pt.8, # 13 Ex.2 Pt.9, # 14 Ex.2 Pt.10, # 15 Ex.2 Pt.11, # 16 Ex.2 Pt.12, # 17 Ex.2 Pt.13, # 18 Ex.2 Pt.14)(Judge, James) (Entered: 01/25/2024)
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF for leave to file excess pages (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/25/2024)
MAILED Patent Request Letter to Plaintiff's counsel Patrycia Piaskowski. (jb, ) (Entered: 01/25/2024)
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF Schedule A (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/25/2024)
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF by Zareefa Burki Flener (Flener, Zareefa) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF Unredacted Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1)(Judge, James) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF by James Edward Judge (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
MOTION by Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF for leave to file Documents Under Seal (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF by James Edward Judge (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PP LLC DBA FF by Patrycia Piaskowski (Piaskowski, Patrycia) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Judge, James) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
COMPLAINT filed by PP LLC DBA FF; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21561113. (Attachments: # 1 Schedule A, # 2 Ex.1, # 3 Ex.2, # 4 Ex.3)(Judge, James) (Entered: 01/24/2024)
查看公开文件 ↗