MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice.
原告撤诉/结案KTM Ag v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto
案件进展
31 条记录MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 13 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 12 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 11 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 10 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 9 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 8 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 7 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Trunkenpolz-Sigl Declaration
DECLARATION of Hubert Trunkenpolz and Viktor Sigl
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by KTM AG
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by KTM AG
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff KTM AG Sealed Schedule A
MOTION by Plaintiff KTM AG to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff KTM AG by John Wilson
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff KTM AG by Robert Payton Mcmurray
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff KTM AG by William Benjamin Kalbac
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff KTM AG by Michael A. Hierl
CIVIL Cover Sheet
COMPLAINT filed by KTM AG; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22993562.
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
