MEMORANDUM by Tyrone Acierto in support of motion for default judgment[34]
原告申请缺席判决Acierto v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
案件进展
37 条记录MOTION by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto for default judgment as to all remaining defendants
原告申请缺席判决SUPPLEMENT to text entry, [32]
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the status report. (Dckt. No. [30]) The Court hereby extends the TRO for another two weeks from the entry of this order. No later than one week from the entry of this order, Plaintiff must file a supplemental statement explaining how, exactly, the issuance of a TRO (as opposed to some other type of order) "allow[s] Plaintiffs to recover account information for the infringing sellers which would not otherwise be available." This Court can understand how Schedule A cases writ large can enable plaintiffs to obtain information about the identities of counterfeit sellers. But it is less intuitive how a temporary restraining order enables a plaintiff to obtain information (as opposed to, say, an order authorizing early discovery). Maybe that's what counsel meant in the filing. But the Court would appreciate an explanation. Mailed notice
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tyrone Acierto of Certain Doe Defendants
STATUS Report by Tyrone Acierto
Revised Schedule A to Complaint by Tyrone Acierto reflecting dismissals to date
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tyrone Acierto as to Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 1/12/2026, answer due 2/2/2026.
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tyrone Acierto of Certain Doe Defendants
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed Plaintiff's motion for an extension of the TRO (Dckt. No. 17). That motion is denied as moot. The Court notes that Plaintiff has not moved for a preliminary injunction since its TRO expired in mid-October. And as a general matter, this Court isn't convinced that the countless TROs repeatedly entered by courts in this District in Schedule A cases are having any real-world impact. The Court also reviewed Plaintiff's various notices of voluntary dismissals (Dckt. Nos. 20, 22, 23 24). Those voluntary dismissals are self-effectuating, and the following defendants are dismissed from the case: platinum crystal snow Zhi, Bobbi UUS, YouYangYGSKJDZGJFIEOGHKFDJ, One Rich, KUQIN, Gaoxi E -commerce Co. Ltd, SIDAN, Crazylunatic, and AW20KGN0YDGDO. By January 12, 2026, Plaintiff must file an amended Schedule A that identifies all remaining Defendants. A summons was issued on October 21, 2025, two and a half months ago. But Plaintiff has not filed an affidavit of service, let alone pursued a default. It is not apparent whether Plaintiff has effectuated service of process. Plaintiff must file a status report by January 12, 2026, and must show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Mailed notice
原告撤诉/结案ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice.
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tyrone Acierto of Certain Doe Defendants
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tyrone Acierto of Certain Doe Defendants
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tyrone Acierto of Certain Doe Defendants
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tyrone Acierto
原告撤诉/结案SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) FIRST DEFENDANT BMBKLC V and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto
MOTION by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto for extension of time of TRO
原告提交TRO申请SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 34,000.00 posted by Tyrone Acierto
TEMPORARY Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Steven C. Seeger on 10/6/2025. Mailed notice.
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion for a TRO (Dckt. No. 9) is hereby granted in part and denied in part. Temporary Restraining Order to follow. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages (Dckt. No. 12) is hereby granted. Plaintiff's motion to seal documents (Dckt. No. 13) is hereby denied. Plaintiff must file a status report or a motion for default by October 31, 2025. Mailed notice.
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff's motion to seal (Dckt. No. 5) is hereby denied for the reasons stated by the Court in Zorro Productions, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (23-cv-5761). Mailed notice.
MOTION by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto to seal document sealed document, 11
MOTION by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto for leave to file excess pages
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM by Tyrone Acierto in support of motion for temporary restraining order 9
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto for temporary restraining order
原告提交TRO申请MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: There is no need for a certificate of service for a court filing when all parties of record receive a copy through CM/ECF. Under the Local Rules, "[a] certificate of service is required only when service of a document filed on the Court's E-Filing system is made on a recipient who is not an E-Filer listed on the docket of the proceeding." See L.R. 5.5(a); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(B) ("No certificate of service is required when a paper is served by filing it with the court's electronic-filing system."). The Court handles service through CM/ECF. In effect, the CM/ECF header is the certificate of service. Save yourself the work, and the trouble. Mailed notice.
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: An initial status report is due by October 24, 2025. Counsel must read the Standing Order entitled "Initial Status Conferences and Joint Initial Status Reports" on the Court's website. The parties must confer as required by Rule 26(f) about the nature, scope, and duration of discovery. The parties must submit two documents to the Court. First, the parties must file the Joint Initial Status Report under Rule 26(f) on the docket. A Word version of the Joint Initial Status Report is available on the Court's website. All parties must participate in the preparation and filing of the Joint Initial Status Report. The Court requires a joint report, so a filing by one side or the other is not sufficient. Second, the parties must email a Word version of a proposed Scheduling Order under Rule 16(b) to the Court's proposed order inbox. Lead counsel for the parties must participate in filing the initial status report. Plaintiff must serve this Order on all other parties. If the defendant has not been served with process, plaintiff's counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy at jessica_j_ramos@ilnd.uscourts.gov to reschedule the initial status report deadline. Plaintiff should not file the Joint Initial Status Report before the defendant(s) has been served with process. The parties must discuss settlement in good faith and make a serious attempt to resolve this case amicably. All counsel of record must read and comply with this Court's Standing Orders on its webpage. Please pay special attention to the Standing Orders about Depositions and Discovery. Mailed notice.
和解/判决执行进展MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Steven C. Seeger. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
MOTION by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto to seal document sealed document 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr
CIVIL Cover Sheet
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Tyrone Acierto Schedule A to Complaint
COMPLAINT filed by Tyrone Acierto; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23805601.