MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document[25]
Pure Body Logistics, Inc. v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
案件进展
29 条记录MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for leave to file excess pages
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Plaintiff
MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[23]
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for temporary restraining order
原告提交TRO申请SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Amended Schedule A
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for TRO [11] is denied without prejudice in light of the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Liu v. Monthly, 170 F.4th 1090 (7th Cir. 2026). In Liu, the Court vacated the district court's entry of default judgment because the "evidence upon which the district court relied for establishing personal jurisdiction showed only that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois, not that such sales took place." Id. at 1093. Specifically, the evidence in Liu consisted "of screenshots of [defendant seller's] website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total, but not a completed purchase." Id. Relying on NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2022) and Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020), the Seventh Circuit explained that such evidence was insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. Here, plaintiff has primarily submitted the same type of evidence, i.e., screenshots of defendants' website showing the checkout page, but not a completed purchase. (Dckt. #13). Although plaintiff also purported to submit photographic evidence of exemplary products purchased from some defendants (50 of 76) in connection with its joinder brief, there is no proof of completed sales reflecting the shipment of those products to Illinois (such as order confirmations and/or a sworn declaration) other than plaintiff simply labeling the exhibit of photos "Exemplary sample purchases shipped to NDIL." This is insufficient. Accordingly, before this case may proceed, plaintiff must file either an amended complaint or a supplemental submission establishing a basis for personal jurisdiction as to each defendant. If an amended complaint or supplemental statement consistent with this order and Seventh Circuit precedent is not filed by 5/8/26, this action may be dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Enduring Love Int'l Church v. Williams, No. 23-CV-1120-PP, 2024 WL 3553979, at *2 (E.D.Wis. July 26, 2024) ("Although sua sponte dismissal of claims for lack of personal jurisdiction is generally disfavored, district courts retain discretion to depart from that principle"). In light of this order, the issue of joinder is entered and continued generally. The previously set 1/9/26 tracking status hearing is stricken and reset to 6/1/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice
原告撤诉/结案ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice.
SUPPLEMENT to order on motion to seal document, order on motion for temporary restraining order, order on motion for leave to file excess pages, terminate deadlines and hearings, set deadlines/hearings, 18
原告提交TRO申请MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal 3 15 and motion for leave to file excess pages 14 are granted. Plaintiff's motion for TRO 11 is entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint, motion for TRO, and Amended Schedule A, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of over 75 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D.Ill. 2020). By 12/5/25, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Tracking status hearing set for 1/9/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Order 16 having been entered in error, is VACATED. Mailed notice.
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Assuming no defendant appears beforehand, plaintiff is directed to file a motion for entry of default and default judgment by December 18, 2025. Mailed notice.
原告申请缺席判决MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document 13
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for leave to file excess pages
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Delcaration of David Gulbransen
MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 11
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for temporary restraining order
原告提交TRO申请SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Amended Schedule A
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr
USPTO Cover Sheet by Pure Body Logistics, Inc.
CIVIL Cover Sheet
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pure Body Logistics, Inc.
MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document 2
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Schedule A to Complaint
COMPLAINT filed by Pure Body Logistics, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24165163.
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
