Amended Complaint
Camille Chew v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
案件进展
11 条记录MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining more than 25 defendants in a single action. By September 23, 2026, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by September 23, 2026 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice. (jlj, )
原告提交TRO申请 查看公开文件 ↗MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (lj, )
查看公开文件 ↗ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camille Chew by Christopher Romero (Romero, Christopher)
查看公开文件 ↗ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camille Chew by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre (Mcintyre, Cameron)
查看公开文件 ↗ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camille Chew by Monica Rita Martin (Martin, Monica)
查看公开文件 ↗ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camille Chew by Adam Grodman (Grodman, Adam)
查看公开文件 ↗ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camille Chew by Yi Bu (Bu, Yi)
查看公开文件 ↗ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Camille Chew by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling)
查看公开文件 ↗COMPLAINT filed by Camille Chew; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25672598.
查看公开文件 ↗CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (mam, )
