Telebrands Corp. v. Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. et al

CLERK'S DEFAULT JUDGMENT: in favor of Telebrands Corp. against GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US, Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd., Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US, Zhijiang Congjuan Trading Co., Ltd. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 9, 2026, Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment is GRANTED; accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against the Defaulting Defendants as to the first cause of action in the Complaint and the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 4/10/2026)

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the oral opinion delivered at the hearing held on March 18, 2026, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 114, to the extent it seeks a finding a liability for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) against Defendants Guangzhou Alpaca Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. d/b/a Xirssvy us; Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Gotocheer us; Jieyang Baopeng Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a Baopeng-US; and Zhijiang Congjuan Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a MAibuL US (collectively, "Defaulting Defendants"). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against the Defaulting Defendants as to the first cause of action in the Complaint, ECF No. 28. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate all pending motions and close the case. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 4/9/2026) (sgz) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

LETTER MOTION to Expedite re: Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 114) and entry of judgment addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jeffrey L. Snow dated April 8, 2026. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 3/18/2026 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERENCE held on 3/18/2026 before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Martha Martin, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/24/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/4/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/2/2026.

SCHEDULING ORDER FOR DAMAGES INQUEST: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall serve Defendants and file Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law concerning all damages, and any other monetary relief permitted under the entry of default judgment no later than April 20, 2026. Plaintiff shall include with such service a copy of this Order. The submission shall contain a concluding paragraph that succinctly summarizes what damage amount (or other monetary relief) is being sought, including the exact dollar amount. Plaintiff may also rely on its prior submissions in lieu of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law but must ensure that its prior submissions comply with this Order and advise the Court that it is doing so by April 20, 2026. 2. Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact should specifically tie the proposed damages figures to the legal claims on which liability has been established; should demonstrate how plaintiff has arrived at the proposed damages figures; and should be supported by one or more affidavits, which may attach any documentary evidence establishing the proposed damages. Each Proposed Finding of Fact shall be followed by a citation to the paragraphs of the affidavits and or page of documentary evidence that supports each such Proposed Finding. To the extent the Proposed Findings contain any allegations regarding liability, the Proposed Findings should cite to the appropriate paragraph of the complaint. Any request for attorneys' fees must be supported by contemporaneous time records showing, for each attorney, the date of service, the hours expended, and the nature of the work performed. Counsel should file an affidavit providing the number of years each attorney has been admitted to the bar and their hourly rate. Counsel should also include charts related to any fees that they are seeking, in terms of hours and number of attorneys, if appropriate. The Conclusions of Law shall include a paragraph or paragraphs setting forth the legal basis for any requested award of attorney's fees including, if applicable, why the number of attorneys involved are entitled to fees. Finally, counsel should provide documentary evidence justifying an award of costs. Any spreadsheet calculations should also be provided in Microsoft Excel format to the Court via email to RicardoNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. In lieu of conclusions of law, plaintiff may submit a memorandum of law setting forth the legal principles applicable to plaintiff's claim or claims for damages (including but not limited to the legal basis for any claim for interest or attorneys' fees). Plaintiff's papers must include an affidavit from someone with personal knowledge, setting forth the facts which establish liability, the proposed damages amount, and facts which establish that the Court has both personal jurisdiction over the defendants, and jurisdiction over the subject matter. Defendants shall send to plaintiff's counsel and file with the Court their response, if any, to plaintiff's submissions no later than May 11, 2026. 3. The Court hereby notifies the parties that it may conduct this inquest based solely upon the written submissions of the parties. See Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 2, Albany, N.Y. Pension Fund v. Moulton Masonry & Const., LLC, 779 F.3d 182, 189 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., 951 F.2d 504, 508 (2d Cir. 1991)); Cement & Concrete Workers Dist. Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, Educ. & Training Fund & Other Funds v. Metro Found. Contractors Inc., 699 F.3d 230, 234 (2d Cir. 2012) (citation omitted). To the extent that any party seeks an evidentiary hearing on the issue of damages, such party must set forth in its submission the reason why the inquest should not be conducted based upon t he written submissions alone, including a description of what witnesses would be called to testify at a hearing and the nature of the evidence that would be submitted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry J Ricardo on 3/19/2026)

Notice Regarding Deleted Document

PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER: Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the oral opinion delivered at the hearing held on March 18, 2026: I. Permanent Injunction 1) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defaulting Defendants are permanently enjoined and restrained from: As further set forth herein. 2) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defaulting Defendants and all persons in active concert and participation with it who receive actual notice of this Order, including the Third Party Service Providers and Financial Institutions who satisfy those requirements and are identified in this Order, are permanently enjoined and restrained from instructing, aiding, abetting Defaulting Defendants and/or any other person who business entity from engaging in any of the activities referred to in subparagraph I(1). 3) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Defaulting Defendants and all persons in active concert and participation with it who receive actual notice of this Order, including Third Party Service Providers who satisfy those requirements and are identified in this order are permanently enjoined and restrained from: A. instructing, aiding, or abetting Defaulting Defendants and/or any other person or business entity in engaging in any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs I(1)(A) through I(1)(D) and I(2) above. II. Miscellaneous Relief 1) Defaulting Defendants may, upon proper showing and two (2) business days written notice to the Court and Plaintiff's counsel, appear and move for dissolution or modification of the provisions of this Order; 2) Any failure by Defaulting Defendants to comply with the terms of this Order shall be deemed contempt of Court, subjecting Defaulting Defendants to contempt remedies to be determined by the Court, including fines and seizure of property; 3) This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter and the parties in order to construe and enforce this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 3/18/2026)

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the oral opinion delivered at the hearing held on March 18, 2026, the Court ORDERS the release of the twenty-five thousand U.S. dollar ($25,000.00) security bond that Plaintiff submitted in connection with this action to counsel for Plaintiff, Epstein Drangel, LLP, 6 East 45th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10017. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 3/18/2026) (sgz) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Inquest After Default/Damages Hearing and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation) Particular Motion: Motion for Default Judgment. Referred to Magistrate Judge Henry J Ricardo. Motions referred to Henry J Ricardo. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 3/18/2026)

***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number [125] AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. The document was incorrectly filed in this case.

***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 125 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE TERMINATED - SUBMITTED. The document was incorrectly filed in this case.

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas: Show Cause Hearing held on 3/18/2026. Present were Jason Drangel, Jeffrey Snow, and Joseph Micali for the plaintiff. No defendants appeared. (Court Reporter Martha Martin)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Vincent Micali on behalf of Telebrands Corp.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Document No. [117] Proposed Default Judgment was reviewed and approved as to form.

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Document No. 117 Proposed Default Judgment was reviewed and approved as to form.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

ORDER SCHEDULING DEFAULT JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND SHOW CAUSE HEARING :It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall file any opposition to the motion for default judgment by March 2, 2026. Defendants are cautioned that corporate entities may appear infederal court only through licensed counsel, see Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), and where such an entity "repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default judgment may be entered against it," Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). It is further ORDERED that Defendants appear for a hearing on the default judgment motion before this Court on March 18, 2026, at 10:30am, as to why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against Defendants. No later than Thursday the week prior to the conference date, Plaintiff must file the proposed default judgment order electronically, using the ECF Filing Event "Proposed Default Judgment," for the Clerk's approval. It is further ORDERED that, within one business day of the date of this Order, Plaintiff serve Defendants via alternative service methods authorized by the Preliminary Injunction Orderwith (1) a copy of the motion for default judgment and all supporting papers; and (2) a copy of this Order. Within two business days of service, Plaintiff must file proof of such service on the docket. (Show Cause Hearing set for 3/18/2026 at 10:30 AM before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas.), (Responses due by 3/2/2026) (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 2/4/2026)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT pursuant to FRCP 55(b)(2). Document filed by Telebrands Corp. Proposed Default Judgment to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 114 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defaulting Defendants. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

AFFIDAVIT of Jason M. Drangel in Support re: 114 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defaulting Defendants. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defaulting Defendants. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT as to 1. Guangzhou Alpaca Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. d/b/a Xirssvy us; 2. Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. d/b/a Gotocheer US; 3. Jieyang Baopeng Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a Baopeng-US; and 4. Zhijiang Congjuan Trading Co., Ltd. d/b/a MAibuL US.

DECLARATION of Jason M. Drangel in Support re: 111 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 1/29/2026

***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Jason Drangel to RE-FILE Document 110 Declaration in Support. ERROR(S): Linked to deficient docket entry.

***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT: Notice to Attorney Jason Drangel. RE-FILE Document No. 109 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): did not mention answer was filed. Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default found under the event list Proposed Orders - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF that - lists the correct filed date of the complaint, lists the correct name(s) of the party(ies) who was/were served, lists the correct date the party(ies) was/were served, lists the correct filed date of the proof of service.

FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of Jason M. Drangel in Support re: 109 Proposed Clerk's Certificate of Default. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - PROPOSED CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). Modified on 1/27/2026

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gabriela N. Nastasi on behalf of Telebrands Corp.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jeffrey L. Snow dated January 22, 2026 re: Status Letter. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

ORDER granting 100 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Beixiao Robert Liu terminated. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas)(Text Only Order) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

ORDER granting 98 Letter Motion to Stay. Plaintiff's request for a stay of all discovery and claim construction deadlines is GRANTED. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas)(Text Only Order)

ORDER regarding ECF No. 103. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file its Motion for Default Judgment against all Defendants is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment shall be submitted by no later than February 1, 2026. Plaintiff shall file their motion for default judgment pursuant to the procedure set forth in Attachment A of this Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas) (Text Only Order)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated December 2, 2025 re: Status Letter and Request to Extend Default Judgment Motion Deadline. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of CONSENT MOTION for Beixiao Robert Liu to Withdraw as Attorney and DECLARATION of Beixiao Robert Liu in Support served on GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US on November 10, 2025. Service was made by Email. Document filed by GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US.

DECLARATION of Beixiao Robert Liu in Support re: 100 CONSENT MOTION for Beixiao Robert Liu to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US.

CONSENT MOTION for Beixiao Robert Liu to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US.

ORDER regarding ECF No. 98. Defendants' response regarding their position with respect to Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 98, shall be submitted by close of business, November 6, 2025. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas) (Text Only Order)

LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 77 Case Management Plan, addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jeffrey L. Snow dated November 4, 2025. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 96 Letter filed by Telebrands Corp. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiffs request for an extension of time to file its Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Baopeng-US is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment shall be submitted by no later than December 5, 2025. Plaintiff shall file their motion for default judgment pursuant to the procedure set forth in Attachment A of this Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. (Motions due by 12/5/2025.) (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 10/27/2025)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated October 24, 2025 re: Request for Extension of Time to File Default Judgment Motion. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

ORDER SCHEDULING DEFAULT JUDGMENT BRIEFING: Defendant Baopeng-US in this action appears to be in default. Plaintiff shall file any motion for default judgment, in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, within two weeks of the date of this Order. Plaintiff should familiarize themself with Local Civil Rules 55.1 and 55.2, which, along with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 5.M of the Court's Individual Rules, govern default judgment motion practice before this Court. Per Local Civil Rule 55.2, a party seeking default judgment must append to the motion a Clerk's Certificate of Default, which may be obtained by following the procedure described in Local Civil Rule 55.1. To be clear: Plaintiff must file the motion for default judgment, not merely the request for a Clerk's Certificate of Default, by the above deadline. If Plaintiff's counsel submits calculations in support of any motion for default judgment, Plaintiff's counsel shall also email native versions of the files with the calculations (i.e., versions of the files in their original format, such as in ".xlsx") to Chambers at VargasNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. If or when a motion for default judgment is filed, the Court will enter a further Order setting a deadline for any opposition and reply and scheduling a hearing. If no motion for default judgment is filed by the deadline set forth above, the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice to the parties. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order electronically and/or by first-class mail on Defendant within two business days from the date of this Order and shall file proof of such service within three business days of the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 10/14/2025)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated October 6, 2025 re: Status Letter. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

PROTECTIVE ORDER.regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 8/21/2025)

PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jeffrey L. Snow dated August 21, 2025 re: proposed Protective Order. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

ORDER REGARDING E-DISCOVERY: The Court ORDERS as follows: 1. This order supplements all other discovery rules and orders. It streamlines Electronically Stored Information ("ESI") production to promote a "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination" of this action, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1. 2. This order may be modified in the Court's discretion or by agreement of the parties. Alternatively, if the parties cannot resolve their disagreements regarding these modifications, the parties shall submit the dispute to the Court in accordance with Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 37.1 and 37.2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York ("Local Rules"). As further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 8/14/2025)

ORDER granting 78 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel submitted by Mr. Adam Urbanczyk, attorney for Defendant Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US ("Baopeng") is GRANTED. ORDERED that Baopeng must obtain representation through a licensed attorney to appear in this case because it, as an entity, cannot proceed pro se and must appear through counsel. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007). Baopeng has until September 12, 2025, to retain counsel in this matter. If new counsel fails to appear on behalf of Baopeng by that date, or an extension of time to seek counsel is not granted, default judgment may be entered against Defendant. See, e.g., Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 78 and to terminate Mr. Urbanczyk as counsel. SO ORDERED. Attorney Adam Edward Urbanczyk terminated. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 8/13/2025)

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas: Motion Hearing held on 8/13/2025. Present were Danielle Futterman and Jeffrey Snow for the plaintiff, Beixiao Robert Liu for defendant Guangzhou Alpaca Home Furnishing Co, Ltd and Adam Urbanczyk for defendant Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongs. (Court Reporter Raquel Robles)

***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. 87 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form.

PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. Related Document Number: 86. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jeffrey L. Snow dated August 8, 2025 re: Proposed Order Regarding E-Discovery. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

ORDER granting 83 Letter Motion for Conference, Remote Participation. The hearing with respect to Mr. Urbanczyk's motion to withdraw scheduled for August 13, 2025, at 10:30am will no longer be in-person, but will instead be held via Microsoft Teams (Meeting ID: 255 243 100 555 4; Passcode: V2Gz3UQ6). (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas)(Text Only Order)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated August 5, 2025 re: Status Letter. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

LETTER MOTION for Conference, Remote Participation addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Adam E. Urbanczyk dated July 30, 2025. Document filed by Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendants Motion to Withdraw [Dkt. 78] and accompanying declarations, Courts scheduling order [Dkt. 81] served on Baopeng-US on July 11, 2025; July 27, 2025. Document filed by Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US.

SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW with respect to 78 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. It is hereby ORDERED that any opposition to the motion to withdraw, whether by Defendant or any other party, shall be filed by August 6, 2025. The Court will hold a hearing with respect to Mr. Urbanczyk's motion to withdraw on August 13, 2025, at 10:30am, in Courtroom 14C, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. If the Defendant wishes to be heard on the Motion to Withdraw, they may attend the hearing or submit a response in writing to the Court prior to the hearing date. No later than July 25, 2025, Defendant's Counsel shall serve a copy of all motion papers and this Order on Defendant Baopeng-US and file proof of such service on the docket no later than two days following service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 7/24/2025)

Set/Reset Deadlines as to 78 MOTION for Adam E. Urbanczyk to Withdraw as Attorney Unopposed. Responses due by 8/6/2025 Motion Hearing set for 8/13/2025 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 14C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas.

ANSWER to 28 Complaint. Document filed by GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US.

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US.

MOTION for Adam E. Urbanczyk to Withdraw as Attorney Unopposed. Document filed by Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US.

CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Depositions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 and 31 shall be completed by the date set forth in paragraph 5(a). Motions due by 8/11/2025. Deposition due by 1/8/2026. Fact Discovery due by 1/8/2026. This case is to be tried to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their best estimate of the length of trial is seven (7) days. Attachment A to the Case Management Plan is also adopted as part of the Scheduling Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 7/9/2025)

ORDER granting 66 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. For the reasons stated on the record during the conference held on July 8, 2025: The Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel submitted by Mr. Sen Wang and Ms. Zheng Gong, attorneys for Defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. ("KDQ") is GRANTED. The Court grants Defendant Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US ("Baopeng") a nunc pro tunc extension of time until July 11, 2025, to submit its response to the Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 66. Attorney Zheng Gong and Sen Wang terminated. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 7/9/2025)

Set/Reset Deadlines: Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US answer due 7/11/2025.

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 7/8/2025. Present were Jason Drangel and Jeffrey Snow for the plaintiff; Beixiao Robert Liu for defendant Guangzhou Alpaca Home Furnishing Co, Ltd; Adam Urbanczyk for defendant Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongs; and Sen Wang for defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. (Court Reporter Alena Lynch)

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 67 Letter filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. ENDORSEMENT: Counsel for Defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. are required to appear at the Initial Pretrial Conference scheduled for July 8, 2025. The July 8, 2025, Initial Pretrial Conference will no longer be in-person, but will instead be held via Microsoft Teams (Meeting ID: 298 076 473 529 5; Passcode: pN6CD6vH). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 7/2/2025)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) served on Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd on July 2, 2025. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

SCHEDULING ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW with respect to 66 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. It is hereby ORDERED that any opposition to counsel's motion whether by Defendant or any other party shall be filed by July 15, 2025. Any reply shall be filed by July 22, 2025. The Court will hold a hearing with respect to the motion to withdraw on July 28, 2025, at 2:30 p.m., via Microsoft Teams (Meeting ID: 265 750 856 077 6; Passcode: BP9yG6U2). If the Defendant wishes to be heard on the Motion to Withdraw, they may attend the hearing or submit a response in writing to the Court prior to the hearing date. No later than July 2, 2025, Defendant's Counsel shall serve a copy of all motion papers and this Order on Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. and file proof of such service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 7/1/2025)

ORDER granting 70 Letter Motion for Conference. The Initial Pretrial Conference scheduled for 7/8/2025 at 2:30 PM will no longer be in-person, but will instead be held via Microsoft Teams (Meeting ID: 298 076 473 529 5; Passcode: pN6CD6vH). (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas)(Text Only Order)

PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 65 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference, Remote Participation addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Adam E. Urbanczyk dated 07/01/2025. Document filed by Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US.

JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel, Beixiao Robert Liu, Sen Wang and Adam Edward Urbanczyk dated July 1, 2025 re: Joint Letter Regarding Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

Set/Reset Deadlines: (Responses due by 7/15/2025, Replies due by 7/22/2025.), Set/Reset Hearings:(Telephone Conference set for 7/28/2025 at 02:30 PM before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas.)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Louis Snow on behalf of Telebrands Corp.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Sen Wang, Zheng Gong dated June 30, 2025 re: Dkt. 66 Motion to Withdraw. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

MOTION for Sen Wang, Zheng Gong to Withdraw as Attorney for Defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on July 8, 2025, at 2:30 P.M. The conference will be held in Courtroom 14C, Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Initial Conference set for 7/8/2025 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 14C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/18/2025)

MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 63 LETTER terminating 59 Letter Motion for Discovery. ENDORSEMENT: Based upon Plaintiffs submission herein, the Court VACATES Paragraphs 4(a) and 4(b) of the Preliminary Injunction Order (ECF No. 54) entered on June 5, 2025, that grant expedited discovery vis a vis Defendants. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF No. 59. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/18/2025)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated June 17, 2025 re: Expedited Discovery. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME granting 37 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 28 Complaint. The letter motion of Defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. ("KDQ") for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant KDQ's deadline to answer or otherwise plead is now extended through and include July 11, 2025. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 37. Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. answer due 7/11/2025. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/13/2025)

ORDER: The Court directs Plaintiff to submit a letter by June 17, 2025, that explains why expedited discovery is still warranted at this time, given that there are no anticipated motions and a preliminary injunction has already been granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/16/2025)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated June 12, 2025 re: Letter Regarding Discovery. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

LETTER MOTION for Discovery addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Sen Wang dated June 11, 2025. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 5/29/2025 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.

TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERENCE held on 5/29/2025 before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Tracy Groth, (212) 805-0320. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/30/2025. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/10/2025. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/8/2025.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER: Defendants are hereby given notice that they may be deemed to have actual notice of the terms of this Order and any act by them or anyone of them in violation of this Order may be considered and prosecuted as in contempt of this Court. The $25,000.00 bond posted by Plaintiff shall remain with the Court until a final disposition of this case or until this Order is terminated. This Order shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, or until further order of the Court. Any Defendants that are subject to this Order may appear and move to dissolve or modify the Order on two (2) days' notice to Plaintiff or on shorter notice as set by the Court. Plaintiff shall file a status letter with the Court no later than August 5, 2025, and every sixty days thereafter until the Court orders otherwise. (As further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/5/2025) (ar) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.

OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The TRO that was entered on May 1, 2025, is hereby vacated and dissolved. Plaintiff shall serve this Order on Defendants' Service Providers and Financial Institutions within 24 hours of the date of this Order, and file proof of service within two days of accomplishing service. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/5/2025)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: 28 Complaint addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Sen Wang dated June 3, 2025. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 16 Motion for Sen Wang to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in theabove captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. Counsel shall immediately forward the Pro Hac Vice fee to the Clerk of Court. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/3/2025)

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 15 Motion for Zheng Gong to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. Counsel shall immediately forward the Pro Hac Vice fee to the Clerk of Court. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/3/2025)

BRIEF. Document filed by Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US.

ORDER re: 14 Letter filed by DEF. The Court hereby clarifies, for the avoidance of doubt, that the TRO does not prohibit the continued advertising, marketing, promoting, distributing, offering for sale or sale by Defendant Xirssvy of any products other than the Infringing Products. Moreover, the TRO does not require Third Party Service Providers, including Amazon.com, to suspend or otherwise shut down the entire online storefront of the named Defendants. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve this Order on Amazon.com by June 3, 2025, and file proof of service on the docket with 24 hours of service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 6/2/2025)

MEMORANDUM OF LAW. Document filed by GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Sen Wang dated June 2, 2025 re: Supplemental Brief Following May 29, 2025 Evidentiary Hearing. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support Regarding Plaintiff's Likelihood to Succeed on the Merits of its Patent Infringement Claim Against Defendants. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated June 2, 2025 re: Supplemental Letter Brief Regarding Plaintiffs Request for an Asset Restraint. Document filed by Telebrands Corp.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ashly Erin Sands on behalf of Telebrands Corp.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason M. Drangel on behalf of Telebrands Corp.

MOTION for Sen Wang to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-31170193. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

MOTION for Zheng Gong to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-31170216. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.

>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 16 MOTION for Sen Wang to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-31170193. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies.

>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 15 MOTION for Zheng Gong to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-31170216. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from B. Robert Liu dated May 31, 2025 re: Clarification of the May 7 TRO. Document filed by DEF.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Beixiao Robert Liu on behalf of DEF.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ADAM EDWARD URBANCXYK granting 47 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The motion of Adam Edward Urbanczyk, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice is the above-caption action is granted. As further set forth by this Order. (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 5/29/2025)

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jeannette A. Vargas: Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 5/29/2025. Present were Jason Drangel, Danielle Futterman, Gabriella Nastasi and Jeffrey Snow for the plaintiff; Beixiao Robert Liu for defendant Guangzhou Alpaca Home Furnishing Co, Ltd; Adam Urbanczyk for defendant Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongs; and Zheng Gong and Sen Wang for defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. (Court Reporter Tracy Groth)

DECLARATION OF ADAM E. URBANCZYK:. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 11 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.(js) Modified on 6/4/2025 (rju). Modified on 6/4/2025

DECLARATION OF JINGTAO LIN:. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 11 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re: 43 : ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 11 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

MOTION for Adam E. Urbanczyk to Appear Pro Hac Vice: ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 11 and unsealed by docket entry 12 *** Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.(js) Modified on 6/4/2025 (rju). Modified on 6/4/2025

PROPOSED ORDER ON MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ADAM EDWARD URBANCZYK: Document filed by Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 11 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.(js) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Sen Wang dated 5/23/2025 re: KDQ respectfully requests that the Court orders Plaintiff to produce relevant medical records for in camera review so that the Court can verify the purported unavailability of Mr. Quilla. In the event that either Plaintiff or Mr. Quilla cannot or refuses to provide such evidence, this Court should strike his declaration from the docket, deny the preliminary injunction, vacate the current TRO and award damages to KDQ from the bond posted by Plaintiff. Document filed by Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 10 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

DEFENDANT GUANGZHOU KEDUOQING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.S LIST OF WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS FOR MAY 29, 2025 EVIDENTIARY HEARING: ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 9 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

DEFENDANT GUANGZHOU KEDUOQING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.'S OPPOSITION TO THE EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Gabriela N. Nastasi dated 5/21/2025 re: Plaintiff respectfully submits that this matter may be unsealed. Plaintiff has additionally enclosed a Proposed Unsealing Order herewith. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 7 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

PROPOSED ORDER UNSEALING ORDER: WHEREAS the Court orders that this Action be unsealed, and Records Management upload all documents filed to date on the Electronic Case Filing system. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 7 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons, Complaint and TRO as well as all papers in support of the Application served on all Defendants on 5/16/2025. Service was made by Alternative methods of service authorized by the TRO. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 7 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

ORDER: Accordingly, KDQ's request for an evidentiary hearing is GRANTED. The Court will not dictate which witnesses Plaintiff must call in support of its motion at the scheduled hearing. Accordingly, each party must exchange (1) the list of witnesses it may wish to call during the evidentiary hearing and (2) copies of all marked exhibits that the parties may seek to introduce into evidence (barring exhibits used solely for the purpose of impeachment) to all other parties by 5 P.M. on Wednesday, May 28, 2025. Any opposition briefs should be submitted to the Court and served upon Plaintiffs counsel via email by Tuesday, May 27, 2025. Any reply papers should be submitted to the Court and served upon all counsel via email by Wednesday, May 28, 2025.The hearing on Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction shall be held in Courtroom 14C of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York on Thursday, May 29, 2025, at 3:00 P.M. So Ordered. If parties seek the unsealing of this case, a proposed unsealing order should be promptly submitted to the Court. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to serve all Defendants with a copy of this Order by electronic means. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 6 and unsealed by docket entry 12 *** (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 5/23/2025)

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated 5/22/2025 re: Counsel for Telebrands Corp. submit this letter in response to Defendant Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd.'s ("KDQ") May 22, 2025 letter ("KDQ May 22 Letter") requesting that the show cause hearing that the Court has scheduled on May 29, 2025 regarding plaintiff's request for preliminary injunction ("May 29 OSC Hearing") be conducted as an evidentiary hearing and that Plaintiff's witnesses who submitted declarations in support of its Ex Parte Application be required to attend the hearing in person to provide live testimony and be subject to cross examination by KDQ. Plaintiff opposes KDQ's demand that the two declarants, counsel of record and Peter Quilla, be required to testify and be subjected to cross examination. Specifically, KDQ seeks testimony from Plaintiff "establishing the prerequisites of obtaining preliminary injunctive relief' and regarding its alleged failure "to show the necessity and appropriateness of the sweeping asset restraint." Document filed by Telebrands Corp. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 5 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

LETTER addressed to Judge Jeannette A. Vargas from Jason M. Drangel dated 5/22/2025 re: Accordingly, in the event that KDQ files a timely opposition, Plaintiff requests seven (7) days to file any reply and that the Court adjourn the May 29 OSC Hearing until a suitable date after such reply is due. Plaintiff would also request the opportunity to examine an officer from KDQ at any evidentiary hearing ordered by this Court. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 4 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***

Vacated as per Judges Order dated June 5, 2025, Doc. # 54 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; ORDER RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS' USER ACCOUNTS, MERCHANT STOREFRONTS AND ASSETS WITH THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; ORDER AUTHORIZING BIFURCATED AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE; AND ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY: Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, Plaintiff's Application is hereby GRANTED as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, as sufficient cause has been shown, that Defendants, their respective officers, employees, agents, servants and all persons in active concert or participation with Defendants, are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions for twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this order, and for such further period as may be provided by order of the Court: as set forth in this order. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to show cause before this Court in Courtroom 14D of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York at 500 Pearl Street/40 Foley Square, New York, New York on Thursday, May 22, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. or at such other time that this Court deems appropriate, why a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a), should not issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that opposing papers, if any, shall be filed electronically with the Court and served on Plaintiffs counsel by delivering copies thereof to the office of Epstein Drangel LLP at 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250, New York, NY 10165, Attn: Jason M. Drangel on or before Monday, May 19, 2025. Plaintiff shall file any Reply papers on or before Thursday, May 22, 2025. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are hereby given notice that failure to appear at the show cause hearing scheduled in Paragraph II(A) above may result in the imposition of a preliminary injunction against them pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, which may take effect immediately upon the expiration of this Order, and may extend throughout the length of the litigation under the same terms and conditions set forth in this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a status letter with updates and proposed steps no later than July 7, 2025, and every sixty days thereafter, until the Court orders otherwise. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall place security in the amount of twenty-five thousand Dollars ($25,000) with the Court which amount is determined adequate for the payment of any damages any person may be entitled to recover as a result of an improper or wrongful restraint ordered hereunderIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint and exhibits attached thereto, and Plaintiffs ex parte Application and the Declarations of Peter Quilla, and Jason M. Drangel in support thereof and exhibits attached thereto, and this Order shall remain sealed until further order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a letter regarding the continuing need for sealing when there is no longer a need to keep the matter under seal or within fourteen days, whichever is earlier. So Ordered. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 3 and unsealed by docket entry 12 *** (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 5/7/2025) (js) Modified on 6/5/2025

DECLARATION OF JASON M. DRANGEL AND ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR: A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; AN ORDER RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS USER ACCOUNTS, MERCHANT STOREFRONTS AND ASSETS WITH THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; AN ORDER AUTHORIZING BIFURCATED AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE; AND AN ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

DECLARATION OF PETER QUILLA AND ACCOMPANYING EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR: A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; AN ORDER RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS' USER ACCOUNTS, MERCHANT STOREFRONTS AND ASSETS WITH THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; AN ORDER AUTHORIZING BIFURCATED AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE; AND AN ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY:

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; ORDER RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS USER ACCOUNTS, MERCHANT STOREFRONTS AND ASSETS WITH THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; ORDER AUTHORIZING BIFURCATED AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE AND ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY: ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

PROPOSED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER; ORDER RESTRAINING DEFENDANTS' USER ACCOUNTS, MERCHANT STOREFRONTS AND DEFENDANTS' ASSETS WITH THE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; ORDER AUTHORIZING BIFURCATED AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE; AND ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY: ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Telebrands Corp. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

COMPLAINT:

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

ORDER, Case unsealed. WHEREAS the Court orders that this Action be unsealed, and Records Management upload all documents filed to date on the Electronic Case Filing system. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Jeannette A. Vargas on 05/28/2025)

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.(jus) Modified on 6/3/2025

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.(jus) Modified on 6/3/2025

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.(jus) Modified on 6/3/2025

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) Modified on 6/3/2025

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jieyangshibaopengmaoyiyouxiangongsi d/b/a Baopeng-US. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Guangzhou Keduoqing Technology Co., Ltd. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

SUMMONS ISSUED as to GUANGZHOU ALPACA HOME FURNISHING CO., LTD. d/b/a XIRSSVY US. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Zhijiang Congjuan Trading Co., Ltd. ***This document was previously filed under seal in envelope 2 and unsealed by docket entry 12 ***.

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.

SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.

***Sealed*** ORDER, Case sealed. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 04/29/2025)

Magistrate Judge Henry J. Ricardo is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf.